Proof

The gap between Oracle's number and yours.

These Oracle audit case studies are anonymized to sector and rough size, and every figure is verified against the signed outcome. Across our work we have defended 95 to 100 percent of audit exposure and over $500M in Oracle exposure, because findings open inflated and reviews cut claims 60 to 80 percent.

Telecom: a Java claim built on the whole workforce

Situation. A global telecom operator received an Oracle Java finding after historic downloads were detected. Oracle applied the per employee metric to the entire workforce, including tens of thousands of staff who never ran Java, and priced it at list across several years.

Exposure. The opening position was 9.4 million dollars, framed as a compliance bill rather than an opening offer.

The buyer side defense. We inventoried every Java install, separated OpenJDK builds already in use from Oracle branded runtimes, and removed Oracle Java from systems where it served no purpose. We corrected the headcount to the contracting entity and tested the download evidence against the free use terms in force at the time.

Outcome, verified. The remaining Oracle runtimes were retired or migrated, and the claim closed at zero. Figures are verified against the signed outcome and anonymized.

Matched service: Java licensing advisory.

Financial services: a ULA renewal repriced

Situation. A European bank approached the end of an Unlimited License Agreement and faced Oracle's renewal proposal, built on a certification count that swept in double counted processors across a virtualized estate.

Exposure. The proposal carried roughly 11 million dollars of avoidable cost over the renewal versus a corrected baseline.

The buyer side defense. We re baselined the deployment, corrected the processor count and the core factor table, and modelled certify versus exit both ways. We then negotiated the renewal against the corrected position and Oracle's own quarter.

Outcome, verified. Eleven million dollars was removed from the renewal. Figures are verified against the signed outcome and anonymized.

Matched service: ULA advisory.

Manufacturing: a cluster wide virtualization claim

Situation. An industrial group was audited across two data centres. Oracle's partitioning policy does not recognise VMware as hard partitioning, so the finding claimed every host the software could run on across both clusters.

Exposure. The opening claim counted hundreds of cores that never ran Oracle software.

The buyer side defense. We reviewed the collection script output before submission, demonstrated where Oracle actually ran, and held Oracle to the signed agreement rather than the policy paper, which was weaker than the contract.

Outcome, verified. The audit closed 92 percent below the opening claim. Figures are verified against the signed outcome and anonymized.

Matched service: virtualization and cloud licensing.

FAQ

Questions about these outcomes.

Yes. Every figure is verified against the signed outcome and then anonymized to sector and rough size. We never publish client names.
Independent line by line review of findings typically cuts claims 60 to 80 percent, and well prepared defenses often settle further below the opening position.
Only with your agreement and always anonymized. Most engagements stay entirely private, and confidentiality is the default.
Get a Quote

Put a verified result behind your Oracle position.

Tell us about your estate and we will scope a Fixed Fee or Gainshare engagement, with no risk to you under the gainshare model.

Independent buyer side advisoryNew York and London